When household budgets tighten, ethical consumption is often the first casualty. Yet in agriculture, periods of economic strain are when fair trading relationships matter most. South Africa’s Fairtrade industry shows how trade-based interventions can strengthen producer and worker resilience.
Photo: Supplied
With food inflation still elevated and discretionary spending under pressure, the question is no longer whether Fairtrade products are affordable luxuries but whether South Africa can afford supply chains that fail the people who sustain them.
Where Fairtrade began, and why it matters to farmers
The Fairtrade movement emerged in the post-World War II period as an alternative to volatile commodity markets that left farmers exposed to price shocks beyond their control. Its modern form took shape in the late 1980s, when minimum pricing and social standards were formalised under what later became Fairtrade International.
Africa’s producers gained direct representation with the formation of Fairtrade Africa, a producer-led body that now represents farmers and workers across more than 30 countries.
Unlike traditional certification schemes focused solely on product quality or environmental compliance, Fairtrade’s core objective is economic: to reduce risk and improve income stability for producers operating at the weakest end of global value chains.
SA’s Fairtrade landscape
South Africa occupies a unique position in the Fairtrade system. While many African countries are dominated by smallholder export crops such as cocoa and coffee, South Africa’s Fairtrade footprint includes commercial farms, worker-owned enterprises, and co-operatives, particularly in wine and tea.
This reflects the country’s agricultural structure, shaped by historical inequality and a strong export orientation. In sectors such as wine and rooibos tea, Fairtrade certification has been used not only to access overseas markets but to address long-standing labour challenges through structured premiums and workplace standards.
Today, South Africa is among the world’s leading producers of Fairtrade-certified wine, while Fairtrade rooibos and black tea have become established niche exports.
What Fairtrade sets out to achieve
At farm level, Fairtrade rests on three practical mechanisms:
- A minimum price, providing a safety net when market prices fall below the cost of sustainable production.
- A Fairtrade Premium, paid in addition to the selling price and ring-fenced for collective projects chosen by workers or producer organisations.
- Progress towards living wages and living incomes rather than compliance with minimum legal standards alone.
These mechanisms are supported by labour protections, environmental safeguards, and democratic decision-making structures. For producers, the value lies less in headline prices than it does in predictability and bargaining power.
Inflation and consumer pressure
According to Statistics South Africa’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) for November 2025, headline inflation stood at 3,5%, while food and non-alcoholic beverages inflation increased by 4,4% year-on-year (y/y).
Although inflation has moderated from earlier highs, rising costs for housing, electricity, and transport continue to erode disposable income. This has direct implications for agricultural value chains, particularly those supplying discretionary goods.
CPI data show that inflation for several so-called ‘luxury’ items closely associated with Fairtrade production has risen faster than headline inflation:
- Wine prices increased by 5,5% y/y
- Hot beverages, which include tea and coffee, rose by 9,3% y/y
- Sugar, confectionery, and desserts, a proxy for chocolate products, increased by 3,4% y/y
These increases place pressure on consumers, but they also highlight the rising input costs faced by producers, including wages, energy, fertiliser, and compliance costs.
Case study: Fairtrade wine and worker-led development
The local wine industry provides one of the clearest examples of how Fairtrade operates in practice.
Fairtrade-certified wine farms typically channel their premiums into worker-managed trusts. These funds are used for projects that improve quality of life and long-term productivity, including housing upgrades, early childhood development centres, transport assistance, and skills training.
For farmworkers, the premium does not replace wages; rather, it supplements them in ways that wages alone often can’t. Access to education and healthcare, in particular, has been cited as a critical benefit on certified farms.
From a production perspective, Fairtrade certification has also helped some producers stabilise export relationships. Buyers in Europe and the UK increasingly view certification as a proxy for risk management, ensuring continuity of supply and compliance with tightening social standards.
Importantly, certification does not insulate wine producers from market cycles or input inflation. However, it provides a structured mechanism for sharing value more equitably when margins allow, rather than shifting all pressure onto labour during downturns.
Tea: small margins, high vulnerability
The tea industry, particularly rooibos, illustrates why Fairtrade is often most valuable when margins are thin.
Tea prices are highly sensitive to global demand and currency movements, while production costs are rising steadily. Labour-intensive harvesting, increasing compliance requirements, and climate variability have left many producers vulnerable.
Fairtrade certification in the tea industry has focused on price stability and community resilience, rather than premium branding alone. Premium funds are often invested in water infrastructure, worker housing, and education support, reducing social risk on farms where margins leave little room for error.
With CPI data showing hot beverage inflation rising by more than 9% year-on-year in November 2025, the gap between retail prices and farm-level returns remains a key concern.
Why Fairtrade matters when money is tight
During periods of economic stress, retailers and processors often seek to protect margins by passing price pressure down the value chain. This is where Fairtrade’s minimum pricing and premium structures play a stabilising role.
For producers, Fairtrade offers:
- Smoother income during downturns
- Reduced exposure to price volatility
- Collective investment in productivity and social infrastructure
For consumers, the benefit is less immediate but equally real. Supply chains that fail producers ultimately fail consumers through reduced availability, declining quality, and long-term price instability.
Beyond charity: Fairtrade as risk management
Fairtrade is frequently misunderstood as a form of aid. In reality, it functions as a market-based risk-sharing mechanism.
Certified producers must still meet quality standards, honour contracts, and compete for buyers. What changes is the distribution of risk and reward along the chain.
In the South African context, where agriculture remains a major employer in rural areas, this risk-sharing has implications beyond individual farms. Stable agricultural employment supports local economies, reduces migration pressure, and underpins food system resilience.
A long-term view
Inflation cycles rise and fall, but the structural challenges facing agricultural producers remain. Fairtrade does not claim to solve these challenges on its own. It does, however, provide a framework for fairer value distribution in industries where power is unevenly concentrated.
As South Africa navigates ongoing economic uncertainty, the lesson from Fairtrade is not that ethics trump affordability, but that sustainable affordability is dependent on sustainable production.
For farmers, workers, and consumers alike, the real cost of cheap food and drink is often paid somewhere else, and usually by those least able to afford it.
