Warning: This article contains disturbing sexual images
Jake and Dinos Chapman (formally known as the Chapman Brothers) are British visual artists who rose to prominence in the 1990s as leading members of the so-called Young British Artists generation. Since then, their works have regularly been exhibited in museums such as the MoMA, auctioned off by prestigious houses such as Christie’s, and repeatedly praised by mainstream news outlets such as The Guardian.
For decades, journalists and art critics have been describing the Chapman Brothers’ works as “provocative” and “iconoclastic.” However, those fancy words are used to cover up what they’re actually praising: Pedo art. Indeed, the duo’s most “iconic” works unmistakably sexualize and degrade children to a sickening degree. Seriously. If someone discovered these things inside a person’s house, they’d inevitably think that this person is deeply deranged.
As you might have noticed, this article is prefaced with a stern warning. In fact, I don’t even recommend reading this article in public unless you want people to look at you weirdly. But, technically, I shouldn’t have to post any warnings. The following images aren’t sourced from obscure, hard-to-find places but from the websites of prestigious organizations. Indeed, this article only contains pictures of “art” exhibited in museums where intelligent people go to engage in the “culture.”
Well, as you’ll probably realize, our “culture” is sick. That is because those who have the means to promote specific artists – the global elite – favor those who cater to their likes, needs, and obsessions, while mass media showers them with praise. Here’s a look at what The Daily Telegraph described as “powerful.”
Searching for “Chapman” on the Christie’s website is a disturbing experience. Not only does one find some of the worst “art” ever made, but also the ridiculous amounts of money people paid to own these things.
A typical Chapman piece: A sculpture of a toddler with an erect penis for a nose and a gaping hole for a mouth.
Yup, this is what we’re dealing with: Sculptures of children turned into sexual objects. The name of this thing, “Fuck Face,” leaves absolutely no doubt about the intentions behind it. It is about the sexualization and the degradation of children.
Related posts
As you can see in the screenshot, a very deranged person paid £115,250 (over $150,000) for this thing. Who bought this?
Another version of Fuck Face: A fully naked girl.
After encountering several of these things, one comes to a disturbing realization: We’re not looking at a strange one-off thing meant to be satirical or whatnot; it is a never-ending series of sculptures with all kinds of horrific variations intended to cater to the needs and fetishes of wealthy weirdos.
Yes, you’re looking at a sculpture of a naked young girl with a vagina between its two heads. And, yes, it is called “Two Faced Cunt.”
And, yes, someone bought it for over $100,000.
The Chapmans also love to sculpt naked children merged together. The name of this piece, “Doggy,” is clearly a reference to a sexual position.
As seen in the screenshot above, “Doggy” was owned by a “New York charitable family trust.” In other words, an elite family bought this and displayed it somewhere.
This abomination is called “Four Headed Cockroach Kid.” According to the listing, it was the property of an “important European collector.”
Yup, people we consider “important” are interested in owning these things.
The Chapmans also liked to create complete set-ups like this one, featuring multiple sculptures. I can only describe this thing as “pedo paradise.” The names of the various pieces listed are truly sickening.
Why do I feel like these things are being used as sex dolls by rich pedo psychos? They’re definitely positioned in a specific manner.
The artists themselves seem to be encouraging the use of their “art” as sex toys.
The duo has released videos and pictures of their “art” used as sex toys. Here: A man’s severed head is used as a sex toy.
Reputable art houses auctioned off these pictures and videos. Where is the line between “art” and unhinged pornography?
When they’re not creating sex toys for psychopaths, the Chapmans love to depict gore and violence.
The Chapmans “brought to life” Goya’s painting “Desastres de la Guerra.” With their own unhinged twist, of course.
Even when creating watercolors, these artists stay focused on their favorite theme: The loss of innocence through the abuse of children.
Despite everything seen above, the Chapman Brothers’ works are praised and celebrated by “high society.”
The elite-owned, socialist publication The New Statesman contributed to the normalization of Chapman’s “art.”
The Dean of the Sheffield Cathedral stands next to the Chapman’s piece Cyber Iconic Man in 2015.
Yes, despite everything seen above, one of the Chapman Brothers’ works was displayed inside a Cathedral. To further highlight the absurdity of the situation, here’s a post on Jake Chapman’s Instagram account.
Jake created numerous pieces inspired by the Sigil of Baphomet, which is the official emblem of the Church of Satan. His account is replete with satanic imagery. Why did a Cathedral agree to put the Brothers’ art on display?
With that said, satanic imagery is not even close to being what’s most concerning about the Chapman Brothers’ social media posts.
As seen in previous articles, people in this “culture” love to dogwhistle fellow degenerates with social media posts that point to their interests. Scrolling through Jake and Dinos Chapman’s Instagram accounts is a concerning experience.
In a recent post, Dinos is dressed as a creepy white rabbit. In Alice in Wonderland, the white rabbit lures Alice through the looking glass. Who is he trying to lure?
Over 30 years later, the Chapmans are still creating bizarre child models. One IG commentator says, “She’s a cutie.”
Infinitely more concerning is that the IG accounts feature pictures of actual children in off-putting contexts.
Looking at thumbnails of Dinos’ IG account, we see multiple artworks based around the theme of loss of innocence. Among these images is a child’s headshot – most likely his son. Why though?
Don’t these personal pictures belong on private social media accounts?
Why is there a picture of a sad-looking boy in an account full of sculptures of creepy naked children? One IG comment says “panda eyes, so you be doing him” and another says “Your personal f*ck toy how nice.”
What is going on here?
Another bizarre picture involving a child. The top comment simply says “Creep.” That about sums it up.
A picture of a baby and a snake. Why? What does it represent? Snakes typically represent sin. So…?
Five babies placed in the shape of pentagram. This looks like pedo-ritualistic insanity. The only (allowed) comment says “Seance.”
For some reason, this pic exists on their IG account. Why? And why does one comment say “Now I’m thirsty!!” It is because the license plate contains the letters PED? As in PEDO?
The works of Jake and Dinos Chapman have been described as “powerful” and “iconoclastic” by media sources and art critics alike. However, after witnessing the pictures above, nobody in their right mind would use these words. What we’ve seen above is actually symptomatic of a sick culture that celebrates pedophilia while complicit media sources normalize it using misleading words.
Some sources even stated that these horrific sculptures comment on the “sexualization of children.” Really. That is like shooting someone in the face to comment on “violence in media.” You’re not commenting on it, you’re propagating it. Furthermore, when one realizes that the brothers’ entire body of work (and even their social media accounts) bizarrely focus on the theme of preying on children, one understands that this is more than “art”.
This is about contributing to the dark and disturbing “culture” of the occult elite and catering to its insane fetishes. As seen above, wealthy “family trusts” and “important collectors” paid massive amounts to own sculptures of naked, deformed, highly sexualized children. Who would want to own such a thing?
You know exactly who.
Latest discussions at the VC Forums
