Download this post…
Congress, with enthusiastic support from President Trump, is unlocking 258 million acres of public land to be sold, not to citizens, but to billionaire arch-technocrats. The Federal Government owns some 630 million acres. Why? Resource extraction, building freedom cities, and mega-datacenters. Pure and simple, this is privatization of America. ⁃ Patrick Wood, Editor.
The Senate’s new reconciliation bill isn’t just about selling public land—it’s about stripping local communities of control. A little-known provision bans states and counties from regulating “AI Systems” for a full decade, opening the door to opaque development far beyond housing. From data centers to deed-restricted zones, this bill rewrites who gets a say in the future of American land.
A Two-Lane Lockdown
On one side, the Senate Reconciliation Bill (H.R.1) proposes to sell 2.2 to 3.3 million acres of BLM and Forest Service land—roughly 0.5% to 0.75% of Western federal holdings. But buried in the fine print is something more dangerous: the bill makes over 250 million acres eligible for private nomination, with no public input, no affordability mandates, and no obligation to reveal who buys the land.
Even more alarming is Section 43201(C) of the bill, which critics have argued could prohibit state or local governments from regulating land use due to its overly broad language of “AI systems.”
Critics, including Beef Initiative policy analyst Breeauna Sagdal, note this section’s vague and expansive language could unintentionally nullify local regulations beyond AI, potentially affecting land use if AI tools are involved.
Examples include; local laws addressing algorithmic bias in housing development, or criminal justice such as the Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) system, or predictive policing systems—banned by many municipalities across the country.
Others have argued that “A.I. Systems” could be interpreted by applicable administrative agencies (who serve at the pleasure of the President) to mean data centers or physical locations. At which point, local zoning would be impacted due to the preemption right granted to the federal government for ten years.
The Big Beautiful Bill contains a provision banning state & local governments from regulating AI.
It’s worse than you think.
It would make it easier for corporations to get zoning variances, so massive AI data centers could be built in close proximity to residential areas.
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) June 5, 2025
Said plainly: the bill doesn’t just sell the land. It preempts local control, creating a sizable gamble dependent upon who occupies the White House.
The Lawsuit Economy
On the other side of the legal equation are state lands held in trust—parcels granted to states to generate revenue for public schools, and offset taxes. Many of these parcels sit undeveloped, not because of market conditions, but because of Endangered Species Act (ESA) litigation.
Under Section 11(g) of the ESA, groups like the Centers for Biological Diversity (CBD) have been incentivized to sue state and federal agencies, making millions in the process, while strong-arming policy changes.
A single lawsuit can halt any project—grazing, wildfire mitigation, even school infrastructure.
CBD claims a 93% success rate in court and funds operations in part through attorney fees recovered in those wins. Their litigation model has shaped national land use policy—and generated millions in the process.
Meanwhile, state lands held in trust go unmanaged. Fires spread. Revenues vanish. And the public never gets to vote on any of it.
This Isn’t Just a Land Sale. It’s a Lockout.
While the Senate bill is framed as a housing solution, the vast majority of BLM and Forest Service lands are located far from existing infrastructure. According to Headwaters Economics, only a small fraction—estimated at under 2%—is near communities where housing is in demand. Moreover, the bill includes no language requiring affordability, density, or public-serving outcomes, leaving open the potential for luxury or speculative development.
Combine that with Section 43201’s 10-year ban on state regulation of AI, potentially impacting local land use regulations, and various federal regulations related to land acquisition and eminent domain use, and a different picture emerges.
